Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and White | Black and Blue |
| Glass | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a score of 90.5 against 77.9. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Motorola DROID Turbo comes with Android 4.4.4 operating system. Although Samsung Galaxy A90 5G is heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's way thinner and also a lot newer.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and more RAM. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior storage for apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G shoots much clearer videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has better 30 frames per second video frame rate and a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 MP resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.