Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and White | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.66 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a score of 90.5, which is better than the Motorola Edge 50's score of 81.2. Although it's the best in this review, the Galaxy A90 5G body is way older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier than Motorola Edge 50. The Galaxy A90 5G works with Android operating system, and Motorola Edge 50 works with Android 14 operating system.
The Galaxy A90 5G features a very superior processor than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy A90 5G, and although they both have a same size screen, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a slightly better resolution of 1220 x 2712 pixels and a little bit higher pixels number per inch in the display.
The Motorola Edge 50's camera is very similar to Galaxy A90 5G's camera, and although the Motorola Edge 50 has a higher 50 MP resolution camera in the back, a way larger back camera sensor and a bigger diafragm aperture, they both have the same video frame rates and the same 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Edge 50 counts with a little longer battery performance than Galaxy A90 5G, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.