Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 90.5 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.27 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic indigo |
| Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.66 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has an overall score of 90.5, which is much better than Moto G Stylus's 79.7 score. The Galaxy A90 5G body is just a bit thinner but a bit heavier than Moto G Stylus, and both were released with only 8 months difference. Galaxy A90 5G comes with Android OS, and Moto G Stylus comes with Android 11 OS.
Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto G Stylus, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy A90 5G also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features just a bit better looking display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little lower display density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit larger display.
The Moto G Stylus's storage for games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's one, they have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Stylus, although it has a tinier aperture, they both have the same (4K) video definition, the same sensor size, a camera in the back with a 48 megapixels and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a bit superior battery duration than Moto G Stylus, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.