Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Ace 4
3GSM-G357FZ
| Global Score | |
| 60.7 | 66 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 4.4 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2014-06-30 | 2018-05-01 |
| 4.78 x 2.48 x 0.43 inches | 6.12 x 2.84 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Gray |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 130.00 | $ 120.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 217 pixels per inch | 282 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 425 MSM8917 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1400 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 308 GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola Moto E5 has a general score of 66, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4's 60.7 overall score. Both phones we are comparing use Android OS, but Motorola Moto E5 has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 has Android 4.4, so it counts with a couple additional features. Motorola Moto E5's construction is newer and somewhat thinner than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4's, but it is a lot heavier.
The Samsung Galaxy Ace 4 features a bit sharper screen than Moto E5, although it has a much smaller screen, a quite inferior pixel quantity in each screen inch and a way worse resolution of 800 x 480px. The Motorola Moto E5 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores.
The Moto E5 shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a back camera with way more mega-pixels and a lot better 1920x1080 video definition. The Moto E5 counts with a much bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 128 GB and 12 GB more internal memory capacity.
Moto E5 counts with a way better battery duration than Galaxy Ace 4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Motorola Moto E5 is also cheaper than the Samsung Galaxy Ace 4.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.