Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Alpha
AT&TSM-G850A
| Global Score | |
| 76.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11 |
| -- | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.21 x 2.58 x 0.26 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 4.06 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Gold, Gray and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 320.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 312 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 31.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.46 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1860mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 11 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.76 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The vivo X70 Pro has a global score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha's score of 76.3. Although it's the best we are comparing here, the vivo X70 Pro is a thicker and extremely heavier device than the Samsung Galaxy Alpha. Both of these devices include Android OS (Operating System), but vivo X70 Pro has the older 11 version while Samsung Galaxy Alpha has Android 4.4.4 version.
The vivo X70 Pro has a little faster processor than Galaxy Alpha, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM memory and 4 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Alpha counts with a little sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, a way worse 1280 x 720 resolution and a really smaller display.
The vivo X70 Pro takes much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Alpha, and although they both have the same video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more mega-pixels, higher video frame rate and a lot bigger aperture for better images and videos in poorly lited situations.
The vivo X70 Pro features a superior memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy Alpha, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro features a much better battery duration than Galaxy Alpha, because it has a 139 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.