Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-09-18 |
| 5.74 x 2.83 x 0.26 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.04 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2600mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.56 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Fold 2 is way better than the Samsung Galaxy C5, getting a overall score of 94.6 against 76.4. Both of these devices use Android operating system, but the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has the previous 11 version and Samsung Galaxy C5 has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although Galaxy Z Fold 2 is notably newer than Samsung Galaxy C5, it's a little thicker and notably heavier.
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C5, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a little sharper display than Galaxy C5, because although it has a quite lower number of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a better resolution of 1768 x 2208 and a much larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C5, because although it has a camera with a much lower resolution, it also counts with a way better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture for better photos in low light environments. Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy C5, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 features a really longer battery performance than Galaxy C5, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 2600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.