Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 386 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XR is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy C7, getting a general score of 82 against 77.7. The iPhone XR is a much newer cellphone than Samsung Galaxy C7, although it's heavier and thicker. Apple iPhone XR counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy C7, because although it has a bit less pixels per inch of display and a bit lower resolution of 828 x 1792px, it also counts with a little larger display.
The iPhone XR has a better performing CPU than Galaxy C7, because although it has 2 lesser CPU cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Apple iPhone XR has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a bigger camera aperture to capture better low-light photos and video.
The Galaxy C7 has a much bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than iPhone XR, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Galaxy C7 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. Galaxy C7 features just a little bit longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 3300mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.