Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2016-06-01 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPhone XS has a global score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy C7's 77.7 overall score. The iPhone XS construction is much newer than the Galaxy C7's, although it's just a little bit heavier and a bit thicker. Apple iPhone XS features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a little higher count of pixels per inch of screen, a quite better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a bit larger display.
Samsung Galaxy C7 features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XS, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy C7 also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 128 GB. The iPhone XS has a superior hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C7, because although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), and they both have a 4 GB RAM memory, the iPhone XS also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone XS counts with a much better camera than Galaxy C7, because although it has a back-facing camera with a lot lower resolution, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a bigger aperture for better low light captures. The Galaxy C7 has superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.