Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.02 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is better than the Galaxy C7's score of 77.7. Both devices in this review include Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola razr (2020) has an older 11 version and Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola razr (2020) construction is notably newer than Galaxy C7's, but it's somewhat thicker and heavier.
Motorola razr (2020) features a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola razr (2020) has a display that is just as good as the Galaxy C7 one, because although the Motorola razr (2020) has a bit worse resolution of 876 x 2142 pixels and a just a little inferior amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite larger screen.
The Motorola razr (2020) has a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy C7, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. Galaxy C7 counts with improved battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) takes way better videos and photos than Galaxy C7, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a bigger diafragm aperture for better low light photos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.