Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-06-01 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.17 x 3.04 x 0.27 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Gray and Pink | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 386 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 8953 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 506 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.02 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 is much better than the Galaxy C7, getting an 87.5 score against 77.7. The Galaxy A71 construction is much newer than Galaxy C7's, although it's a little heavier and a little bit thicker. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android operating system, but Galaxy A71 has the older 11 version while Galaxy C7 has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C7, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a slightly better looking screen than Galaxy C7, because it has a little bit higher pixels count in each inch in the screen, a larger screen and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 has a lot bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has more internal storage capacity and an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C7, because it has a 4500mAh battery size instead of 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.