Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.67 x 2.81 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Midnight green, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 999.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple-designed 4 core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.35 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3046mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.04 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a little bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, with a score of 84.9 against 81. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Galaxy C9 Pro counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS. The Apple iPhone 11 Pro is a somewhat thicker phone than the Galaxy C9 Pro, but both weight the same.
The iPhone 11 Pro has a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel number in each screen inch and a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution. The iPhone 11 Pro features a superior hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
The iPhone 11 Pro shoots better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot worse resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a bigger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality. Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior storage for applications and games than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB.
The Galaxy C9 Pro features greater battery duration than Apple iPhone 11 Pro, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3046mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.