Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | iOS 15.x |
| 2017-02-24 | 2022-03-18 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 429.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Avalanche and Blizzard, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 3220 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.62 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2018mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 3.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone SE (2022) is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a general score of 86.6 against 81. Apple iPhone SE (2022) is a incredibly newer and a lot lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it's a little thicker. Apple iPhone SE (2022) has iOS 15.x OS, and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro works with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
IPhone SE (2022) features a little more vivid screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the screen, a much smaller screen and a much lower 750 x 1334 pixels resolution. The Galaxy C9 Pro features a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than iPhone SE (2022), and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has a SD memory slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB.
The iPhone SE (2022) counts with a superior CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Apple iPhone SE (2022) counts with a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less MP resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a way better video definition and a bigger aperture.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a very superior battery lifetime than iPhone SE (2022), because it has a 98% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.