Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| Metal | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a global score of 84.5, which is just a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro's overall score of 81. The iPhone XS Max construction is newer, but just a little bit thicker and a little bit heavier than the Galaxy C9 Pro. Apple iPhone XS Max features a quite better processing power than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The iPhone XS Max counts with a brighter screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a better resolution of 1242 x 2688 pixels, a quite larger screen and a little bit better pixel number per inch of display. The Galaxy C9 Pro has a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external SD slot that admits up to 256 GB.
The iPhone XS Max has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lot less megapixels resolution camera, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture for better captures and videos in low-light environments and a much higher 3840x2160 video resolution. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has superior battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.