Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2017-09-21 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue, Purple and Silver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 307.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 30.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than the LG V30, having an 81 score against 79.1. The Galaxy C9 Pro body is somewhat heavier but just a little bit thinner than LG V30, and both of them were released with only a couple of months difference. The LG V30 features a better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the LG V30 also has a higher pixels number in each display inch and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
The LG V30 has a bit better processing unit than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The LG V30 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the LG V30 also has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy C9 Pro counts with improved battery life than LG V30, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity against 3300mAh. The LG V30 captures clearer photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same resolution back facing camera, the LG V30 also has a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.