Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Aurora black |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than Galaxy C9 Pro, getting a score of 83.7 against 81. Both phones in this comparison include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. The LG V50 ThinQ is a newer and a little lighter device than Galaxy C9 Pro, but it is also thicker.
LG V50 ThinQ has just a little better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. Both have a 6 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit. The LG V50 ThinQ has a sharper screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a greater pixel count per inch in the screen, a quite larger display and a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ takes much better photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a much lower resolution back-facing camera, it also counts with a much larger aperture and a way higher (4K) video resolution. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ's battery life is very similar to the battery lifetime in Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.