Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and Blue |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a score of 81, which is just a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. Galaxy C9 Pro's design is noticeably newer and thinner, but just a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. These phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy C9 Pro has newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4, giving some nice extra features.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a lot better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and much more pixels per display inch. Galaxy C9 Pro has a much greater memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 256 GB and more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster) and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a GPU. Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light photos and videos, it also counts with a much better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with lot more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.