Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, having an 81.2 score against 81. Although Motorola Edge 50 is somewhat thicker than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, it's just a little lighter and notably newer. Both phones in this comparison review have Android OS (operating system), but the Motorola Edge 50 has 14 version and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
The Motorola Edge 50 has a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little more pixels per inch in the display, a quite larger display and a higher 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features a lot better performance than Motorola Edge 50, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with much more memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 has superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much higher 3840x2160 video quality, a larger diafragm aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations and a lot more mega pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.