Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Mystic indigo |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the Motorola Moto G Stylus, getting a overall score of 81 against 79.7. Galaxy C9 Pro is an a lot older phone than Motorola Moto G Stylus, but it is noticeably thinner and a bit lighter anyway. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Moto G Stylus has Android 11.
Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bit higher 1080 x 2300 resolution, a bit larger screen and a little greater pixels number in each display inch. Motorola Moto G Stylus and Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro have incredibly similar CPUs, and although the Motorola Moto G Stylus has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Motorola Moto G Stylus captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos and videos, a lot higher (4K) video definition and a much higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back camera. The Moto G Stylus features a superior memory to store more games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB and more internal storage.
The Moto G Stylus has a battery lifetime that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.