Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Gray and White |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than Moto Z4, with an 81 score against 79.8. Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's body is a bit thinner than the Moto Z4, although it's heavier and was released 2 years before. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while Moto Z4 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro and Motorola Moto Z4 have really similar processors, and although the Motorola Moto Z4 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Moto Z4 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite larger display and a just a little better screen density.
Moto Z4 features much more memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto Z4 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Galaxy C9 Pro has just a bit better battery duration than Motorola Moto Z4, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3600mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.