Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 15 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | -- |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black and Gold | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 367 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro is slightly better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having a score of 81 against 79.2. Both phones in this review have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15, so it gives some additional features.
The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a lot better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Galaxy C9 Pro counts with a very superior performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) captures a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with a way better 50 MP resolution and a bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures in poorly lited environments. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features longer battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.