Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Metal | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G is much better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a 91.8 score against 81. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Galaxy A71 5G has the previous 11 version and Galaxy C9 Pro has Android 6.0 Marshmallow. The Galaxy A71 5G body is notably newer and just a little bit lighter, but thicker than Galaxy C9 Pro.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px, a little greater pixels amount per inch of screen and a little larger screen. Galaxy A71 5G features a much better storage for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has 128 GB internal memory and an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has a little better performance than Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a much more MP back facing camera, a bigger aperture to capture better images and video in low-light situations and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Galaxy A71 5G has a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.