Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android |
| 2017-02-24 | 2019-09-04 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than Galaxy C9 Pro's general score of 81. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G's design is extremely newer than the Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it's thicker and just a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G counts with Android OS, while Galaxy C9 Pro comes with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS.
Galaxy A90 5G has a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger display. The Galaxy A90 5G features a much bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 cores. The Galaxy A90 5G captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low light images, it also counts with a much more mega pixels back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A90 5G features a little longer battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.