Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-10-17 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.22 x 2.87 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black and Gold | 16 777 216 |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 900.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 9.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3330mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than Xperia XZ3's score of 79.6. The Galaxy C9 Pro construction is way thinner and just a little lighter than the Xperia XZ3, although it was released around 20 months before. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has older 6.0 Marshmallow version while Xperia XZ3 has Android 9.0 Pie.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Xperia XZ3 also has a higher pixels amount in each inch in the screen and a lot higher 1440 x 2880 resolution. Xperia XZ3 counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy C9 Pro, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Xperia XZ3 has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xperia XZ3 also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features superior battery life than Xperia XZ3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
The Xperia XZ3 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a camera with a higher 19 mega pixels resolution and a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.