Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 14 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black and White |
| Metal | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is just a bit better than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with an 81 score against 77.8. The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a notably older and thicker cellphone than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Samsung was able to build it somewhat lighter anyway. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a newer 6.0 Marshmallow version while vivo X Fold 3 Pro has Android 14 version, providing a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much better display than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a way better 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a lot larger screen and a bit higher display density. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a very superior memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 448 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a much better performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery life than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 5700mAh battery capacity. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures way better pictures and videos than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a bigger aperture to take better captures and video in low light environments, a back-facing camera with a way higher resolution and a way better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.