Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11 |
| 2017-02-24 | 2021-04-02 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 367 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.78 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.24 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, with an 81 score against 78.8. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro has a more recent 6.0 Marshmallow version and vivo X60 Pro has Android 11 version. Even though Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro is much older and a little bit heavier than the vivo X60 Pro, it's body is still just a little bit thinner.
Vivo X60 Pro counts with a little better hardware performance than Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X60 Pro also has more RAM. The vivo X60 Pro features a slightly better screen than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a little bit larger display, a quite better 1080 x 2376 pixels resolution and a little bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Vivo X60 Pro has a lot better camera than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back-facing camera, a way better (4K) video quality and a larger aperture to take better images and video in low-light situations. The vivo X60 Pro features a lot bigger memory for apps and games than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory.
The vivo X60 Pro features a little longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a 4200mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.