Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | -- |
| 2017-02-24 | 2018-08-29 |
| 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Gold | Black, Blue and Red |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 367 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 510 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.78 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.24 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is slightly better than the Galaxy C9 Pro, with a overall score of 85.5 against 81. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 body is newer and just a little lighter than Galaxy C9 Pro's, but it is extremely thicker. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit sharper display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a quite larger display, a just a little better screen density and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2246 pixels.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has more RAM memory. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, and although they both have a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 256 GB, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1's battery performance is very similar to Galaxy C9 Pro's battery performance. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a way less mega pixels back-facing camera, and they both have a F1.9 camera aperture, the Xiaomi Pocophone F1 also counts with a lot better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.