Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11, 10 | Android 11 |
| 2020-10-16 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy F41 is just a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, having a score of 85.2 against 78.3. Even being the best device in this comparison, Galaxy F41 is an older, just a little heavier and somewhat thicker device than the vivo X70 Pro. Both of these phones come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect.
The Samsung Galaxy F41 has a slightly better looking screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel number per inch of display. Vivo X70 Pro features a little better processing power than Galaxy F41, and although they both have 8 cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM.
Vivo X70 Pro's camera is just as good as Samsung Galaxy F41's camera, because although the vivo X70 Pro has a lot lower 50 MP resolution camera in the back and a worse 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture and a larger sensor taking higher quality pictures and videos.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy F41, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy F41 features longer battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.