Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-02-22 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.69 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 420 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Exynos 9825 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a general score of 88.1, which is better than the vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 score. These devices come with the same Android 11 OS (operating system), so you shouldn't notice any differences in that aspect. Even being the best in this review, it must be told that it's also a heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
Galaxy F62 has a little sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit inferior pixel amount per inch of display, it also counts with a little bigger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a greater amount of RAM memory and a larger number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a quite bigger memory capacity to store more apps and games than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy F62 features a much better battery life than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4450mAh.
Vivo X70 Pro features just a bit better camera than Galaxy F62, because although it has a much less mega-pixels resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, it also counts with a larger aperture and a larger camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.