Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 362 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is way better than Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a general score of 97.6 against 81. Both phones in this comparison review come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version and Galaxy XCover Pro has Android 11, providing you a couple nice extra features and improved performance. Samsung Galaxy Fold's design is noticeably heavier but much thinner than Galaxy XCover Pro, and both of them were only released with a couple months difference.
Galaxy Fold counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM. Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little better pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy Fold features a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a little longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has an 8 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Fold counts with just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a back camera with way less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a larger aperture and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy XCover Pro. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy Fold, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.