Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Vivo |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-09-30 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| -- | Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has an overall score of 97.6, which is a lot better than vivo X70 Pro's 78.3 general score. Both of these phones use Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy Fold has 9.0 Pie version while vivo X70 Pro has Android 11, giving lots of additional features and performance optimizations. The Samsung Galaxy Fold construction is somewhat thinner than vivo X70 Pro, but it is notably heavier and was released many years before.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Fold. They have 8 processing cores and a 12 GB RAM. Vivo X70 Pro has just a bit better looking display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse 1080 x 2376 resolution, it also counts with a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
Galaxy Fold features a very superior storage to install games and applications than vivo X70 Pro, because it has 256 GB more internal memory capacity. Vivo X70 Pro has a bit better battery performance than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 2% greater battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photography and video, and they both have the same 60 fps video frame rates and the same (4K) video definition, the vivo X70 Pro also counts with a lot better resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.