Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2021-03-29 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.47 x 2.94 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 8.25 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Ceramic Black and Ceramic White |
| -- | Ceramic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 516 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1700 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (1920 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 8.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold is a little bit better than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, having a global score of 97.6 against 90.7. Samsung Galaxy Fold is an older and somewhat heavier phone than the Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, but Samsung made it thinner anyway. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Fold has newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra has Android 11 version, so it provides lots of additional features.
Galaxy Fold features just a little better hardware performance than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a larger amount of RAM. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features a much better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3200px and a higher screen density.
Galaxy Fold counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra, because it has 256 GB more internal memory. Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra features just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Xiaomi Mi 11 Ultra captures greater photos and videos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not so good for low-light captures and video, it also counts with a lot bigger camera sensor providing a lot better image quality, a lot higher video definition and a much more mega pixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.