Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android |
| 2019-09-27 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 5.80 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Black, Blue, Gold and Red |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 5.9 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2244 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 422 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 710 SDM710 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 616 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3120mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Fold is a lot better than the Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, getting a 97.6 score against 75.9. Galaxy Fold works with Android 9.0 Pie OS, and Xiaomi Mi 8 SE counts with Android OS. Galaxy Fold's construction is newer and a little bit thinner than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE's, but it's also heavier.
The Galaxy Fold features a bit more powerful processor than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory. The Xiaomi Mi 8 SE features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2244px and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater display density.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a way bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has 512 GB internal storage. The Galaxy Fold takes clearer videos and photos than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, and although they both have the same resolution back camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 0.39 inches sensor, the Galaxy Fold also has a lot larger diafragm aperture and faster video frame rate.
Samsung Galaxy Fold counts with a much better battery life than Xiaomi Mi 8 SE, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.