Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 97.6 | 77.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| Android 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-09-27 | 2024-01-15 |
| 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches | 6.34 x 2.95 x 28.98 inches |
| 9.74 ounces | -- |
| Cosmos black and Space silver | Forest Green, Lavender Purple and Midnight Black |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1980.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2152 x 1536 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 362 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G99 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 18.62 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 10.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Fold has a global score of 97.6, which is much better than the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro's 77.1 overall score. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Fold has a newer 9.0 Pie version while Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro has Android 13 version, so it offers a couple additional features and performance tweaks.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with a better screen than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a bit lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater screen density. Galaxy Fold counts with a much faster CPU than Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Fold also has more RAM memory.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro counts with just a bit bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1 TB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way more megapixels back-facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and pictures.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Fold, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.