Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola Edge 50 Pro is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), having an 86.3 score against 71.8. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro body is notably newer, but just a little bit thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017). Galaxy J5 (2017) counts with a much greater performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 10 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, more pixels per inch in the display and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. Motorola Edge 50 Pro features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Motorola Edge 50 Pro shoots greater videos and photos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a lot more MP camera in the back, a bigger diafragm aperture and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.