Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 282 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has an overall score of 79.2, which is better than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)'s 71.8 general score. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) body is newer and a lot thinner, but also heavier than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017). Galaxy J5 (2017) features a much faster CPU than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light images and video, it also counts with a lot better video definition and a back-facing camera with much more mega-pixels.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much better storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.