Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is much better than the Galaxy J5 (2017), having a 98.9 score against 71.8. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra body is noticeably newer than the Galaxy J5 (2017)'s, but it is noticeably heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a faster processor than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has an incredibly better display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a lot higher screen density, a lot larger display and a way better 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a camera with much more megapixels and a way higher video definition.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a much better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.