Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 94.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-03-06 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.72 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 5.78 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cloud blue, Cloud pink, Cosmic grey and Cosmic white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3200 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 566 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S20 is a lot better than the Galaxy J5 (2017), having a score of 94.8 against 71.8. The Galaxy S20 is a just a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy J5 (2017), but they are 0.31inches thick. Galaxy S20 counts with a much sharper screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a much better resolution of 1440 x 3200px, way more pixels per inch in the screen and a bigger screen.
Samsung Galaxy S20 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S20 has a more powerful CPU than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S20 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S20 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S20 features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier aperture and a less mega pixels back-facing camera, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.