Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2017-07-04 | -- |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.64 ounces | -- |
| 16 777 216 | -- |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S25 is better than the Galaxy J5 (2017), having a general score of 82.6 against 71.8. Galaxy S25's body is extremely thinner and notably lighter than the Galaxy J5 (2017). The Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017) counts with a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy S25 counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a better pixel amount in each display inch, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S25 has a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a back camera with a much higher 50 MP resolution and a way better video definition.
The Galaxy S25 counts with a very superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy S25 counts with improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.