Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 88.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-02-14 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mirror black and Mirror purple |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 1380.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip has a general score of 88.5, which is a lot better than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017)'s global score of 71.8. Even though Galaxy Z Flip is somewhat heavier than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), it's a bit thinner and also much newer. Galaxy Z Flip counts with a much better looking screen than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a much higher amount of pixels per display inch, a bigger screen and a lot better resolution of 1080 x 2636px.
Galaxy Z Flip counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 240 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy Z Flip has a quite better performance than Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip also has a larger amount of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip counts with just a little better battery performance than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 10% bigger battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip features a much better camera than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture and a back-facing camera with lesser MP, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.