Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-08-07 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Metal | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G is way better than Galaxy J5 (2017), with a overall score of 92.3 against 71.8. Galaxy Z Flip 5G's design is much newer and a bit thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Galaxy J5 (2017). The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy Z Flip 5G also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much better looking display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a lot better count of pixels per display inch, a larger display and a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2636px. The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a camera in the back with a lower resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, it also counts with a lot higher (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a much greater storage to install games and applications than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 10 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.