Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 87.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-05-12 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.43 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Cyber grey, Electric purple, Neon blue and Phantom white |
| Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.98 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is way better than the Galaxy J5 (2017), having a global score of 87.9 against 71.8. Although Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro is incredibly newer than Galaxy J5 (2017), it's way heavier and somewhat thicker. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a more powerful processor than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro also has more RAM.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro features a lot better looking display than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a bigger screen, a greater amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro captures way better videos and photos than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a very superior memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Xiaomi Poco F2 Pro counts with a way better battery lifetime than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 57% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.