Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-07-04 | 2020-05-05 |
| 5.76 x 2.81 x 0.31 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.64 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 282 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.96 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is much better than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), with an 81.1 score against 71.8. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a notably newer cellphone than the Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), although it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a much higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a larger display.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has 64 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy J5 (2017), and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy J5 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a way better battery life than Galaxy J5 (2017), because it has a 5020mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.