Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 69 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2017-07-07 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.96 x 3.01 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 240.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.48 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T's global score of 69. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer and a little bit thinner than the Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T's, although it's somewhat heavier. The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a way better screen density, a bigger display and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120px.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has 112 GB more internal memory and a slot for an external memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ has a more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 4 GB more RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ has improved battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a 21% more battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
LG V50 ThinQ costs a little more money than the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2017) AT&T, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.