Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.5 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 7.0 Nougat | Android 15 |
| 2017-07-01 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.00 x 2.94 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 6.38 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Rose gold and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 401 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP2 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.48 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3600mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) is just a bit better than Galaxy J7 (2017), having a general score of 79.2 against 73.5. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (Operating System), but the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has older 15 version while Galaxy J7 (2017) has Android 9.0 Pie. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s body is notably newer and incredibly thinner than Galaxy J7 (2017)'s, but it's also just a little bit heavier.
Galaxy J7 (2017) counts with a much better looking display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lot smaller display. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory.
Galaxy J7 (2017) features a much better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy J7 (2017), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with longer battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 (2017), because it has a 31% bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.