Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-07-13 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 230.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | P-OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V40 ThinQ has a score of 81.2, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 (2018)'s overall score of 72.5. The LG V40 ThinQ is a just a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner device than the Galaxy J7 (2018), even when both of them were released only a few months apart. LG V40 ThinQ features a quite better performance than Galaxy J7 (2018), and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the LG V40 ThinQ also has more RAM.
The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a much better display than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px, a much higher amount of pixels per inch of display and a bigger screen. The LG V40 ThinQ has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018), because although it has a worse 12 mega pixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a larger camera sensor taking better quality photos, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a bigger aperture to capture better photos and videos in poorly lited situations.
LG V40 ThinQ has a way bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy J7 (2018), because it has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and 64 GB internal storage capacity. The LG V40 ThinQ counts with a battery life that is very similar to Galaxy J7 (2018)'s battery performance.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, LG V40 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the Samsung Galaxy J7 (2018).
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.