Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 5.0 |
| 2017-06-20 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 386 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.02 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.28 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The HTC One M9 is a little bit better than Galaxy J7 Max, getting a 77.7 score against 76.1. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (Operating System), but HTC One M9 has 5.0 version while Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat. HTC One M9's body is somewhat lighter than Galaxy J7 Max, but it is somewhat thicker and was released 2 years before.
The HTC One M9 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1920 x 1080, the HTC One M9 also counts with a little more pixels per inch in the display. HTC One M9 has a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has lesser RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra graphics processor and a 64-bits processor.
HTC One M9 has a superior camera than Galaxy J7 Max, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not nice for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back facing camera with a much higher 20 megapixels resolution and a lot higher (4K) video definition. The Samsung Galaxy J7 Max features a bit bigger storage capacity for applications and games than HTC One M9, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 256 GB.
Galaxy J7 Max counts with improved battery lifetime than HTC One M9, because it has 3300mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.