Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.1 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 7.0 Nougat | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2017-06-20 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.31 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 386 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T880 MP2 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.02 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
LG V30S ThinQ is a bit better than the Galaxy J7 Max, having a overall score of 82.5 against 76.1. Although the LG V30S ThinQ and Galaxy J7 Max were only released with a couple of months difference, the LG V30S ThinQ is a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V30S ThinQ has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy J7 Max has Android 7.0 Nougat version, counting with some nice extra features and enhanced performance.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V30S ThinQ also has more RAM memory. The LG V30S ThinQ has a little bit better display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a higher screen density, a quite larger screen and a way better resolution of 1440 x 2880px.
LG V30S ThinQ takes slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a lot higher 3840x2160 video resolution, a camera with a better resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and videos. LG V30S ThinQ counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V30S ThinQ's battery duration is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy J7 Max one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.