Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | Android 14 |
| -- | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Metal | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.88 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.13 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a score of 87.1, which is better than Galaxy J7 Prime 2's 75.3 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, Motorola Edge 50 Ultra's construction is heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Both of these phones use Android OS (Operating System), but Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has an older 14 version while Galaxy J7 Prime 2 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has a little worse amount of pixels per display inch, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bigger screen. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2 counts with an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a way larger sensor taking lot higher quality videos and pictures, a back-facing camera with a way better resolution, a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and a larger diafragm aperture for better photography in poorly lited situations.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3300mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.