Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.3 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.0 Oreo, 7.1 Nougat | -- |
| -- | 2020-07-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Gold and Rose gold | Surfing blue |
| Metal | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | LCD |
| 401 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7870 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.88 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.1 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.28 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G 5G Plus has a general score of 82.6, which is slightly better than the Galaxy J7 Prime 2's global score of 75.3. Despite being the best in this comparison review, the Moto G 5G Plus design is heavier and thicker than Galaxy J7 Prime 2. Moto G 5G Plus counts with a bit better processing power than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, and although they both have 8 cores, the Moto G 5G Plus also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Moto G 5G Plus features a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a just a bit more pixels per inch in the display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2520px and a bigger display. The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus counts with a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has more internal storage and a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola Moto G 5G Plus has a way better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3300mAh. Moto G 5G Plus shoots a lot better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Prime 2, because it has a much bigger sensor taking much better quality videos and photos, a way more mega pixels camera, a larger aperture and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.