Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 72.7 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-06-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.38 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1280 x 720 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| TFT | OLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T830 MP1 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.73 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 9.44 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.13 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the Galaxy J7 Refine, with an 83.7 score against 72.7. Both devices in this review work with Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Galaxy J7 Refine has Android 8.0 Oreo version. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is newer and just a bit thinner than Galaxy J7 Refine's, although it's also a bit heavier.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a much better 1440 x 3120px resolution, a larger display and a lot better pixel number per inch of display. LG V50 ThinQ features a superior processing power than Samsung Galaxy J7 Refine, and although they both have the same number of cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has a greater amount of RAM.
The LG V50 ThinQ takes better pictures and videos than Galaxy J7 Refine, because although it has a worse 12 megapixels resolution camera in the back, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video resolution, a larger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations and a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a higher photo and video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy J7 Refine, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.